BCS or playoffs? A question that has everybody talking. Can we really determine the best college football team with the bcs system? I think the BCS system is flawes at every level. With the rise of smaller teams, and there being at least 3 upsets every week, it is increasingly harder for a team to go undefeated in college football. Too many teams are good
now-a-days to ask a team to go unblemished in a 11 games season. Asking a computer to judge the best teams, or the media guys that have never played a down of football to judge is not realistic.
A playoff system would end the debate every year of who is the best team. Instead of a computer or media making the decision it should be played out on the field. It would make more money than the BCS because fans would want to watch their team make it to the the top rather than smaller named schools inn bowls that nobody cares about. This year the BCS system lucked out when Florida, the best team in the nation, won the national championship; But next year when it doesnt work out perfectly everybody will again be asking the question, "Why hasn't college football changed over to playoffs yet?"
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
First of all, don't criticize my rankings. Yeah Beyonce should have made it, but honestly its my blog and i will do what I want lol.
ReplyDeleteNext off, I agree that a playoff would settle the debate as to who is the best. A team would actually have to win out to be a champion (imagine that). UF sure wouldn't have won hahaha. All of those bandwagon english teachers would be disappointed lol.
Playoffs so then my team USC and our safety Taylor Mays would have one the title. But for real teams like Utah who went undefeated and beat Alabama in its bowl game should have had a shot at the title and all of the other one lost teams should of had to.
ReplyDelete